The Fury said:
It's hard to know what they do, the reasons these books sell aren't all because of the writer or artist, it's the characters in them. Harry Potter films were successful because it was Harry Potter, not a certain director. A film set in the HP universe but without HP might not do as well, sowhy take the risk, why not just keep making HP, if it brings in the money? All about what money they can make in the end. |
In other places of the globe it works different. But each culture with its needs, but that explain Nintendo milking, cod, guitar hero, etc.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







