By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
t3mporary_126 on 04 May 2015
Edit Thread
tbone51 said:
t3mporary_126 said:


Why not follow the Fire Emblem IF's model? All three version are similar in artstyle in Fire Emblem IF but each version will have a lot of exclusive content and will be cheaper if you buy one of the version. So why can't X and Y owners download Pokemon Z for a cheaper price as well?


I think thats alot different, and with 15+ years inthe business, they would never do a DLC like that. Lowest Entry for pokemon was Crstal+Emerald at around 6.5mil each.

Srry i just dont see it :0

Which is significantly lower than their original two version's sale.

Imagine how much more sales Pokemon Z can achieve if they remove the price entry for previous X and Y owners. And good DLC pricing can convince people who are interested in Pokemon Z (or X2/Y2) to buy Pokemon X/Y and then Z because the reduced price for two games seems better than one full price game.