By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Einsam_Delphin said:
Hynad said:

I'm not asking for any changes. I'm saying there are not much changes and that's why there are franchises fatigue from a general gamer's perspective.. Core Nintendo fans don't seem to realise that,


If you play every single entry in a franchise, not only is that your own choice and not any game in said franchise, but you definitely aren't a general gamer then. This is what reviewers fail to realize, not everyone has played every game prior to the one being review'ed, thus anything about those prior games wont be relevant to everyone. Going on about how Tropical Freeze doesn't innovate from Returns certainly does nothing for me having never played either game, only waste my time.


It's a review. It is subjective. As such, it is based on the experience of a person. It can never be unbiased. 

But you seem to worry about the score more than about what the content of the review points out. Why care about whether or not Tropical Freeze scored lower than Returns? Shouldn't you instead read other aspects of the review instead? You know, the text that usually describes what the gemeplay is like, how difficult it is, and whatnot?  Isn't that what you wish to read, if you want to know if a game is for you or not? Or is it wrong for people to score something lower when you think it deserves more? What's it exactly that bother you about those review scores? 

There are plenty of reviewers out there. Surely you can find some that better align with your ideologies and stop caring about an agregate that doesn't give you the big picture?