sc94597 said:
Again market value =/= market price. Market price is the minimum at which people can buy a good (in your scenario the market price of the XBO is $200.) Market value is the maximum at which a person/group of people will buy a good. Market value is different for different people. There is an average market value, which you are alluding to, but that can only be determined through an open-market auction and it is very much price AND time dependent. YOU MUST provide context when you say "more valuable." In your scenario I value an XBO at $200 or anything less than $350 - (the perceived cost of sale.) That is the most I will pay for it. On the otherhand my willingness to pay for the Wii U can exceed this value, and therefore I value the Wii U more than the XBO, even if I choose the XBO to fund my purchase of the Wii U. An alternative scenario is if you have $350 and you want an XBO (the market price of the XBO is $350.) You find a Wii U for $200 and sell it for $300 to help fund your XBO and also gain some extra money. In the end you make $100 on top of your $350 and buy your XBO + a game. Just because you chose to buy a Wii U before buying an XBO does not mean you value the Wii U more than the XBO. You valued the XBO AT LEAST at $350 and the Wii U at most at $300 ($200 you paid + $100 profit you make from it.) |
What YOU (or I) value a product at means nothing to anyone - Virtually no one will knowingly/willingly pay more than the market price of a readily available product - Your willingness to pay more for a Wii U than an Xbox One is a definition of nothing but your preference- it has nothing to do with value unless a critical mass within a market felt the same way- which is not the case







