sc94597 said:
Please enlighten me. You had a good argument there! Wait nevermind, I don't take economic lessons from someone who can't distinguish economic value from market price. Edit: For those who are interested, to illustrate my point with a graph.
|
I agree that value is intrinsic to the consumer and not manufacturing cost (see the launch for the PS3)- Even if an individual consumer is willing to pay more for a Wii U( IF they had to) than an X box One-, they would not do so becausae THEY WOULD NOT NEED TO- if a person who preferred a Wii U could either buy an X box One or a Wi U for $200 they would buy the X box one if for no other reason than to sell it for a profit and put it toward a Wii U (granted if money was not an issue for the individual they may not go to the trouble for convinience reasons or the value of their own time- but most people (that prefered a Wii U) would take the $100-$200 profit they could get for the X box and essentially get an even beter value on their Wii U
The consumer ultimatly sets the value and no mass product (if any product) is priced at the exact terminal value all current purhcasers are willing to pay at that time - that would be impossible to accomplish - individually what we personally value a product is not meaningful to anone else with rare exception (unless your dealing w a con artist )
Either way- I now give you an A+ for effort due to your nice grapgh







