By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sc94597 said:
Dunban67 said:

But not many people are willing to pay more for a Wii U than what it sells for as there  are not many people willing to pay the current selling price for a Wii U=        MANY being the key word in the definiton you supplied-   Relativly speaking MANY more are willing to pay more for the Xbox One than a Wii U because they already have and continue to do so 

Certain Amiibo would be a better example for your definition 

The issue with this is that we don't know how much the current purchasers value the Wii U. It could very well be the case that if XBO stayed at $500 or $400 that it would do Wii U level sales, and if the Wii U were priced (it was close with $350) that much the direhard Nintendo fans who are currently buying the Wii U would still purchase it. In that scenario, as unlikely as it is, both the XBO and Wii U have the same number of people who value it at the high price, and therefore the same value. Again, value is dependent on the individual purchasers. The XBO/Wii U could possibly have some people who value it more at different prices. If both the XBO/Wii U were at $250 you can't say that the XBO will certainly have more people who value it than the Wii U, beause it is quite possible that people planning to purchase a Wii U just can't afford $300 and that is why $250 is the most they are willing to pay for it. On the otherhand people who value the XBO might possibly be able to afford $300 and therefore any gains from a price-cut might be less. So it isn't as simple as, "XBO has more powerful and therefore - pricy - components and therefore it is more valuable." 


 You are reaching and ignoring the facts-  but you get an "A" for effort