spemanig said:
It doesn't matter what they said. You show, don't tell. Right now, they've said and have shown nothing to confirm that there would be any more than one online mode playble at launch. That's pathetic. A single player campaign isn't a mode, no matter what they call it. It's a campain. It's just as insignificant as talking about the single player in COD or Battlefield. That just leaves one local and one online mode at launch. That's pathetic. That's F2P quality. Being a new IP isn't an excuse. Titanfall was consider extremely bare in content at launch, and it's launch features blow this game out of the water. Never making a shooter isn't an excuse either. It's not "enough." You don't get to charge $60 for an experiment and not get criticized for it. |
What are you even talking about? How do you know is worse or better, have you played dude? The game looks GORGEOUS in every sense of the word GORGEOUS. "One online playable mode at launch" and what? Is that a big problem? really? Are you going to have a lot of problems reching level 10 on turf mode? maybe 3 hours? LMAO, and you still have the single campaign and the Battle Dojo.
You are trying very hartd to see bad things man. A year ago no one was giving a shit about this game. Now is have to be P-E-R-F-E-C-T-I-O-N, better than any other shooter on the human history, and have more features than cod, more modes than battlefield, be more hardcore than titanfall blah blah blah because if not... is pathetic.
I find indeed pathetic that way of thinking, not the game.







