By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mandalore76 on 22 April 2015
Edit Thread
tak13 said:
Mandalore76 said:

Sorry, I was just trying to be thorough in showing where I got the info for posing my question.  I wanted to be definitive in my position in the hopes that it would spur someone with a contrary opinion to provide evidence to back up their own stance.  I apologize if it was overkill, this being my first thread and all.

By the way, the poll is very close (and has been pretty much throughout the discussion) with almost 50 votes tallied at this point!


I'm kidding dear,simply it's hillarious that me and many others have quoted this link in spite of having it in your op!:p

Well I thought that the 104m+ was winning by far!:P However, 104m should not be neck to neck with the 102.49m,as the 102.49m is the undisputedly right and you have provided tons of proofs, or rather compelling evidence!:P

Ah, okay, no problem!  Yeah, you're right.  It seems like they think the adjust down would somehow tarnish the consoles legacy, which it wouldn't.  Or that it would be easier for the Wii to become the second highest selling console, which while the gap would be much closer, I still don't think would happen.  It is telling that many of the people who are voting for the lower number are also supporting their vote with evidence to back it up.  While, those voting for the higher number are not able to do the same.