By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zekkyou on 10 April 2015
Edit Thread
Samus Aran said:
Zekkyou said:

I don't know if there have necessarily been any downgrades (the video compression makes proper comparisons difficult), but there are definitely aesthetic differences between the two. They could be completely contextual though.

[image]

I personally think the left side looks a bit nicer (i tend to prefer more dramatic uses of lighting), but graphically it looks great for a WiiU game regardless. It's certainly the most visually ambitious title we've seen from Nintendo to date.

Zelda will probably look better considering it got delayed for a year. The grass and foliage are 2D sprites in xbx, they're much better in Zelda.

Zelda U's grass and foliage is just sprites too, but they do appear to be a higher resolution (as well as there being more of it, and with more dynamic properties). I can't actually think of a single game where the grass isn't 2D (or at least 2D with joints) :p

It will make for an interesting comparison though. They have very different focuses, but i expect you'll be right.