Kane1389 said:
ToraTiger said:
I actually agree with Nintendo 100% on this Angry Joe B.s. I don't enjoy L.Ps or any other non-gaming hobby that isn't video games. I don't watch Youtube at all, but I never got the point of letting gamers make millions using other people's products to make commentary and reactions on them. Look at it this way, shouldn't a movie company get money where ever a channel on T.V plays their film? It's the same thing in this case. They're getting ad money by entertaining people with someone else's copyrighted product. I think Nintendo did a good job, and I honestly wished other game devs made a similar policy.
This is only a bad move because Nintendo is now losing a lot of advertising, but they're partner share program is fair imo besides the fact that your channel can only play nintenod games...
Also lol@ letting people making millions by playing video games and stream, and worst is letting them take all the proceeds themselves..
|
I'll let you in on a little secret
...
When people pay money for a product (in this case, buy a game) it's effectively their product and they can make whatever they want with it. And they are not making money out of the game, but out of their lets plays and editorial videos which they put their own effort, talent and time into
|
It's the same as using someone's copyrighted music in a movie trailer without their permission. Surely since they bought the music they have the rights to disrespect the aspects and use the assets for their own profit, right?
