Dr.Vita said:
Skullwaker said:
Yes, but the Wii U games only had to cover the cost of porting, while Declassified had to cover the entire cost of developing/marketing/etc. since it was an exclusive title.
It makes more sense to put BLOPS 3 in particular on Wii U, considering it's Treyarch developing the game so it should sell more than the previous Wii U games. For reference, BLOPS 2 sold more than Ghosts despite being a launch title. Because it was actually a quality port. Now that the Wii U has a larger and more active install base, BLOPS 3 should sell more.
|
So you think Call of Duty Declassified was expensive? No way, the game was shit. Activision haven't invested any money in it.
Call of Duty Declassified was shit and sold a lot more than 2 big Call of Duty main games on Wii U, which were at least ported good.
|
Yet again, it was an exclusive. it cost a lot more than the combined porting expenses for both wii u cods. if the game was multiplat, it would have sold far less on vita.
