By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
IkePoR said:
DélioPT said:
As your list shows, they have enough manpower to support their Fusion strategy. Of course, there's a mix between 1st party and 2nd party, but the point still stands.
Even if they just release 10 games every year, that's more than enough.

The more important question is: how will they support it? With what kind of titles?
The market has been showing them that they need to make more than just Mario, Zelda, MK, etc. They need to learn from 3rd parties and make those type of games. And making it Nintendo's style (like Splatoon) won't be enough.

Quantity is pretty much assured. The real problem will really be diversity and what type of diversity they will bring to their consoles.

Uhh... that's less than 1 game per month.  Considering they'd want to drive sales on black friday/christmas, 2-3 of those 10 will release in Oct-Nov, so that'd be 5 months a year with zero games.  

If 10 is more than enough, what would be "enough"?

I was only speaking about internal production, not published titles of 3rd parties (MH3, Bayonetta 2, Lego City, etc.)
10 games just made by Nintendo would mean 2 months without games. Now if you add published titles, the number would increase.

And if you look at the recent past, Nintendo has been having published titles aswell as part of it's catalog. So, we could actually see a game every month.
Because if you take those out and just count Nintendo's own games, then the list is even shorter.