| RolStoppable said: Here's what happened: User says Nintendo DLC is bad, user calls out Nintendo fans for being hypocrites (they badmouth all DLC, except Nintendo's), user gets identified as a potential hypocrite and is consequently put the test, user denies an answer a total of three times. So the logical conclusion is that said user is indeed a hypocrite. If someone repeatedly denies to give an answer to a short and simple question, then something is fishy. It's not a stretch in the least to assume that the answer would be unfavorable for his case. And since so much time has passed since he has denied an answer, any answer he gives now that would paint him as a non-hypocrite would most probably be a straight lie. |
So, it's a lose-lose either way, who would anyone bother to answer you when you've already made the conclusion and decided that should they post anything counter to this conclusion; it is likely false? I know I wouldn't.
I walk away from discussions all the time in here if they're headed nowhere, it happens quite often.
