JEMC on 07 April 2015
The score vs non-score debate is interesting and, while I don't mind reviews without scores and I also think that the pros and cons list should be enough, I can understand the reasons given by some to have them.
Maybe we could arrange a middle of the ground situation without scores but with badges or stamps like Eurogamer does now. We could go with 3 situations: normal/good games that wouldn't get a badge, terrible games that would earn a PASS badge, and very good/excellent games that could earn a MUST PLAY distinctive.
Just my 2c.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.
