By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
o_O.Q said:
ihatefatkatz said:
Like I said in the previous thread. Both sides (nintendo and angry joe) look petty, pathetic and greedy.

And to those saying this is anti-consumer, how the fuck is nintendo's youtube policy affecting the consumers? In what way does this affect those who purchase product. Please explain to me. It affect no one but those who make money on youtube and nintendo. If you said anti-youtubers then "yes", but anti-consumers? gtfo


i regularly watch gameplay on youtube of some of the games i play for various reasons

 

most recently when the gta online heist update was released i watched youtube videos to see which of the new vehicles i should try to get for myself and that's just one example of how its useful

 

to claim that because you do not personally see the value in having this option means therefore that no one can possibly see the value in this is silly

There hasn't been a mass exodus of Nintendo content on youtube since the program started. All the big Nintendo let's players are still there, and I can guarantee that you can search any Nintedo game on youtube and you will find content for it. Youtubers are bitching about the money aspect of the policy. That is, Nintedo takes 30-40% of the revenue. It's a case of a greedy corporation vs a greedy youtuber fighting over money.