o_O.Q said:
ihatefatkatz said: Like I said in the previous thread. Both sides (nintendo and angry joe) look petty, pathetic and greedy. And to those saying this is anti-consumer, how the fuck is nintendo's youtube policy affecting the consumers? In what way does this affect those who purchase product. Please explain to me. It affect no one but those who make money on youtube and nintendo. If you said anti-youtubers then "yes", but anti-consumers? gtfo |
i regularly watch gameplay on youtube of some of the games i play for various reasons
most recently when the gta online heist update was released i watched youtube videos to see which of the new vehicles i should try to get for myself and that's just one example of how its useful
to claim that because you do not personally see the value in having this option means therefore that no one can possibly see the value in this is silly
|
Stop acting like there isn't plenty of Nintendo related stuff on youtube.