Lafiel on 07 April 2015
| ihatefatkatz said: Like I said in the previous thread. Both sides (nintendo and angry joe) look petty, pathetic and greedy. And to those saying this is anti-consumer, how the fuck is nintendo's youtube policy affecting the consumers? In what way does this affect those who purchase product. Please explain to me. It affect no one but those who make money on youtube and nintendo. If you said anti-youtubers then "yes", but anti-consumers? gtfo |
uhm, I can see how it is considered "anti-consumer"
more and more people are trusting Youtubers' opinions and presentations of games over review sites and official PR to make their purchasing choices and Nintendo is making that presentation part pretty much impossible for dedicated ("professional") Youtubers
