Mr Khan said:
ReimTime said:
Well I could try to really stretch it with a theory that I just made up:
YouTube let's plays and gaming videos are a huge medium for the youngest generation. This policy could result in less coverage of Nintendo games by both large and small channels; meaning less interest from youngest generation. Small Nintendo channels may shift to other platforms to replace or coincide with their Nintendo content and/or disappear all together (which I have seen), resulting in less content. Large channels may choose to not show any Nintendo content to receive maximum revenue. Influential YouTubers like PewDiePie who speak out against the policy could influence young children into developing a disinterest in Nintendo (it's a stretch but extreme fans could be influenced by PDP's views). Future YouTubers may decide not to show Nintendo content since they will receive >10% of ad revenue for those videos. All of the above prevents Nintendo from having as big of an impact they could have on the developing generation.
That's all I got lol. I have no direct evidence whether or not the younger generation is less interested in Nintendo than older folks were when growing up. I feel like Nintendo will always have an in to the youngest generation with handhelds though.
|
I could see it being more a thing where Let's Plays can have a substantial impact on niche titles (hidden gems and the like), but this is unlikely to be of real value to anyone other than indies.
|
Yea we still have no proven evidence of how YouTube affects the market; just theories. Would CoD be as popular as it is now without the tremendous influx of YouTube gameplay (FaZe/Ali-A/Tmartn etc)? I don't know whether YouTube coverage affects game sales, or game sales affect YouTube coverage for larger games like that. But for smaller titles, YouTube coverage definitely equates to sales.
