By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Samus Aran on 02 April 2015
Edit Thread
hsrob said:
Samus Aran said:
hsrob said:

There were two other paragraphs in my post, conveniently overlooked ;)

Nintendo have made sequels to games that have sold less and not made sequels to games that have sold more.

F-Zero would not be a big risk to make.  They could even use the MK engine.

What sequels have they made to games that sold less than 650k and 160k?

When I ask people what makes F-Zero so different from Mario Kart they say the speed. Well, now you got it.

Fire Emblem, Sin and Punishment for example. Look through Nintendo's 2nd and 3rd tier franchises and there are plenty of franchises with entries that have sold under 600K. 160K, probably not so many, but there are some.

If you didn't even want to debate that point then you just had to say so: Setting, track design, speed, characters, vehicle damage, no weapons, story mode, number of racers, DNFs, difficulty, driving model and controls, music, custom-made vehicles.

Am I to take from this that you haven't actually played F-Zero?  Funny that, thinking that a game you've never played doesn't deserve a sequel.

I played it at a friend's once, Mario Kart is a lot more fun.