Goodnightmoon said:
No, they have done around 20 games for the Wiiu on 2 years and a half, and most of them have very good critical reception. Neither Sony or Microsoft are able to do that number of games to their console (how many games has Sony make for its ps4? the third parties are doing all the job for them, they seeem lazy to me, 4 bad exclusives, that´s all). Plus, Nintendo paid for titles like Bayonetta 1 + 2, Wonderfull 101 and Devil´s third to add variety to their console. How the hell the company making more games for its console is the one putting no effort? IT HAS NO SENSE |
Sony and MSFT incorporate 3rd party devs into their console ecosystem It is a major part of the value they offer- Why would anyone want 1 primary developer develping for their console when they can have a signifcant varety of developers creating content on an ongoing basis for the respective console owners - I only own a Wi U- but if you think what Sony did to turn around the fortunes of the PS3 and MSFT is doing to help the Xbox 1 get back into the game are lazy then you must not know anything about how the business works-
The point you are aing about Nintendo creating games for the Wi U is the point I am makng- the difference is you seem to think the Wii U is better off with just Nintendo working on it s console but I beleive it is better to have many devs working on content for a console- The market place seems to think so too which is why the Wii U is selling at a historically poor sales rate
Remember- virtually every multi plat on the XBOX or PS IS an EXCLUSIVE as far as Wii U owners are concerned because WE can t play them- what differnce does it make to me if i only own a Wii U that a game is on 1 dor 100 oter consoles f it is not on the console i own?
PS: by far most objective people do not think Nintndo has given near its best effort re the Wii u- IF it is Nintendo s best effor they will contine to lose huge market share going forward-
