By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
cfin2987@gmail.com said:


Dude, never said this incident was racist. I said others were. anyway... I'm done trying to explain. You were complaining that BBC had made a business mistake. I am trying to explain why bbc aren't businessmen, and they have a lot of beuacracy to deal with. And why Clarkson is 100% better off working with a private entity. If you can't stop trying to argue with me and accept facts, then it is what it is.

 

And a little punch? This isn't the first instance. If you condone violent behaviour, that is childish and your choice, but even so, if Jeremy wants to do this kind of thing at work, he needs to get an employer who allows it (not the government). The day they start allowing government employees to beat eachother up in the UK, is the day the UK will collapse.


I never said you claimed THIS incident was racist. My point was that if there were in fact other incidents in which he did display racism then those would have been good reasons to get rid of him. And yet, they apparently did not, so giving a man a bloody lip is worse than being a racist to the UK government then huh?

It is not in the least bit childish to question this decision. Also I never said or even implied that I condone violent behaviour. The point is something you can look past and work out for the sake of everyone's best interests