Soundwave said:
I get what you're saying. You want a super powerful Nintendo wonderconsole that brings back third party support and to have Nintendo razzle dazzle Western developers. I wouldn't mind that either. I just don't think realistically that is in the cards. That Nintendo died with the 1990s, but under Iwata they are not that company any longer. When the likes of Howard Lincoln, Minoru Arakawa, Peter Main, and Yamauchi himself retired, the company simply was never the same, people just never really noticed it because they kept making Mario/Zelda/etc. games. NX will be a gimmick based console, look at how they're already describing it -- a "new hardware concept" that will introduce "new ways to play". C'mon, we've been down this road with the Wii and Wii U before. Nintendo also doesn't really give a f*ck what hardcore gamers on the internet think they should do. They are run by an extremely conservative and old group of Japanese board members -- only their opinion matter. If Miyamoto wants to make a console with a dildo controller, that's what's going to happen, not what you or I feel should happen. Wouldn't surprise me actually if that was the price Miyamoto and the other creative types at Nintendo paid for NX ... they get to make NX their way, but the concession they had to make to Nintendo's business brass was to allow the company to make Android/iOS games. So they finally (and probably bitterly) caved on that position. My advice -- just enjoy the f**king games. To be honest Mario Kart 8 and Xenoblade look pretty freaking amazing running on a low end console. I have a PS4 and X1 and a decent PC rig and it's not like when I turn on my Wii U I go "holy crap! These graphix are sooo outdated". If Nintendo NX home version is even 2x-3x that, their games will still look great. |
Well, I am not saying it will be a console that is as powerful as a ps5/x2 or anything. I am just saying that why all these fusion ideas are horrible because they are and I gave plenty of reasons why. If Nintendo goes with these "hybrids" or "same games on both with similar specs" route. It will be their demise because it won't go after the wii audience nor will it go after the ps4/x1 audience or even the Nintendo console audience. It will just mainly go after the Nintendo handheld audience
And yes, I agree Nintendo doesn't care and thats exactly they are in this position to begin with and thats exactly why if they go with majority of the fusion ideas, they will exit the console market in the generation after. And thats why my Fusion OS with different hardware and different games is the best idea. It will decrease development time and increase games output while catering to both handheld and console market as well as the third party market. It wont give out games as fast as a single "platform" but it will still output games faster than they are currently and third party games will fill in the gaps
And finally. I do enjoy their games and thats why I am so vocal about it because if they go with most of these ideas... It will be their demise and the last thing I want to see is them going out of the console or handheld market. I have a pretty great gaming PC with 970s and I can play most games on max yet I don't think none of the Nintendo games look bad. I have defended Nintendo game's visuals many times but the thing is, having a console with a lot of power will gamers a new experience because of the visual enhancements because otherwize... We will just get the wiiU experience in terms of graphics once again and I don't want that. I want even higher graphics than the wiiU with bigger worlds and more fap worthy Nintendo art style instead of essentially the samething as the wiiU.
But yea, lets agree to disagree
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850







