By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ruler said:
RolStoppable said:
Because they are talking about game quality when they say that.


Evolve was hated by almost everyone who bought it see the metacritic it got a 4.4 by the users. And dying light got also mediocore reviews too from users and reviewers. Both games also dont look graphicly impressive.

I dont see a reason why the Old Gen versions had to be sacrificed for both titles.

User scores are never to be taken seriously, ever.

Both of those games are in the mid/high 70's IIRC, nothing wrong with those scores.

People want developers to move away from last gen because it allows the games to really take advantage of next gen hardware. Look at Mordor for example. Last gen doesn't have the nemesis system, which frankly is the only real great thing about the game. You can say Dying Light got some mediocre user scores, but how would that game have worked on last gen hardware? The open world would have been a lot smaller, the on screen numbies a lot fewer in numbers.

It's the same thing PC gamers bitch about all the time regarding consoles. They hold PC's back. Last gen hardware holds back current gen games.