Exclusive: Critics Admit To Lowering Scores For Attention.

[curl-6]

eva01beserk said:

curl-6 said:

But who are we to say how reviewers judge a game? Everyone has their own personal preferences and opinions. For some people, one element may completely ruin or redeem the experience. 
Forcing a standardized process ignores that different people have different analytical approaches and perspectives, in my opinion.

Not trying t tell them how to review a game, tryng to make them tell us for what reason they are giving points, like I said, if a game like call of duty the gameplay impacted them and want to give it a 10/10, but the story underwhelmmed them and give it a 5/10 its understandable cuz those games priorityze gameplay over story, so if they give gamplay 10/10 and story 9/10 to boost the average score, we will know they are not trustworhty, they will still be able to give any score to any game, we will just be able to know when they are giving bullshit scores. We just want them to tell us what part of thhe game they give the points to and what others the deduct.

Some reviewers don't take a segmented approach though, they review a game holistically, assessing how it fits together as a total package rather than the sum of its parts. I get what you're aiming for now, I just don't think it would be a good fit for all reviewers.