Rock_on_2008 said:
I bet some reviewers make review scores and write reviews for games based on either screen shots or watching video footage. |
Considering the current trend where games have been heading and the "hardcores" priorities, it's understandable that you rate games by screenshots and videos. But as what it comes to topic, the rating needs a context to work, which is where metacritic and gameratings fail, since the idea of the sites is to give the rating out of context and bias. Best way to get something out of ratings, is to read reviews from reviewers that share your taste in games. People who only like shooters rarely rate anything challenging high, no matter how you'd think your favorite 55% puzzle game is the best game ever made. It would be interesting to see how people would be crying if the Singstar audience would start rating peoples favourite shooters, for their preferences, to low 60's or low 50's. There's also a lot of factors that has something to do with the bias in the rating. Usually the most popular platform gets the "better" rating, which makes 360 games getting better rating in US and PS3 in Europe. In Wiis case, the different approach seem still to cause some point reductions. Although, if the generation would have started in the current situation, the launch games would have gotten better ratings in general.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.







