super_etecoon on 28 February 2015
How is this article or this thread proof of anything? it doesn't take much to throw up some info about critics saying this or critics saying that. If this was an independent study by a trusted media source who had actual critics going on record with bonafide whistleblowers this might mean something. At this point this article just reads like your typical paranoid fanboy rant. It's worth a discussion, but to suggest that this is proof is presumptive.
