EA Access Grants Members To BFH Five Days Early, Fans Flip Out Over EA XB Deal

[Mr Puggsly]

Aeolus451 said:

walsufnir said:

Again: Why not let the market decide?

Because people for the most part are short sighted. :D Don't believe me? How do bad presidents/leaders get elected? EA would just do just enough to enhance the percieved value in the service and the rest would be history.

It don't take much to convince people that something is a good idea but it takes everything to convince people something is a bad idea. Just bring enough immediate benefits to something and people will buy into it for the most part. Sony wisely denied the service. 

Besides, the service is on other platforms, so your experiment is already live and it's proving the naysayers right on EA access, already. "We" will get to see how it plays out in the "long run" on a isolated platform(s). 

These are weak arguments.

1. You're comparing paying for entertainment to electiing politicians. There is zero logic in that thought.

2. Sony rejected EA Access becaue they just want to push their subscription services. PS Plus and PS Now. Sony should have rejected PS Now because that's is a terrible value for the average gamer.

3. How are the naysayers proven right about EA Accesss? Early trials were something EA promised from the start with their service. That's something Sony rejected for their users.