Ruler said:
walsufnir said:
For you to start such a service, you have to have a decent sized library on a console. Whether you think EA's library is good or not is totally up to you but at least they have enough games to put in their vault. Others don't (for example Capcom).
And of course in the end you can always decide if you want to subscribe to the service or not. It is an option. If it's good or not to have the option is of course influenced if you even have the chance to get the option which could already be seen last year when the service was announced.
|
Capcom has better games than ea imo. And ea access is starting to get how i was excepting it to be, corrupted. First they started to offer free games now they are denying none-subscribers the acces for 5 days. What comes next? removing content for none-subscribers?
imagine if every publishers does their own service, every game would be delayed for 5 days unless you pay their service. EA isnt creating value but is taking others away, how is this service good?
|
*sigh* Did you read my post? I was intentionally leaving out quality and mentioned quantity. Put aside your opinion about EA, Capcom or whatever but if you want people to buy your service to "rent" games you have to have a good amount for your service to ensure also variety.
It's almost as if you had repeated your initial post, this time augmented with your opinion on Capcom's game quality without even replying to anything I said.
