| Mr Khan said: I'm going to draw a parallel with what i've been posting on my own sad little crush-story: if the girl liked me, she'd respond to me regardless of how poor my game has been. A solid game could move me along quicker, but in the absence of interest, the slickest game in the world isn't going to get the girl. So is the case with Wii U. The problems are underlying, although if the console *were* appealing, it would be held back a bit by the name, but not to any important degree. |
Or on people considering Nintendo games is true quality by being bug free and some Sony/MS being pretty turds (just graphics)...
Maybe people that have different opinion on quality would say nintendo games are well polished (bug free) turds (because they don't like the game itself.
We usually have difficult to understand why someone is dumb by not having the same taste as us.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
