Jimquisition: The Old 'How Long Should Games Be?' Debate

[ArchangelMadzz]

sundin13 said:

ArchangelMadzz said:

People who complain about a game being too short for $60 probably would be mad about a $120 200 hour RPG. The hypocrisy.

Errrrr...I don't think thats hypocrisy. i think thats just being having a ceiling when it comes to how much they are willing to pay. Two completely different factors when it comes to determining worth.

It is, if a game is too short to be worth $60 that means that the length of a game = $ paid. The shorter a game is the less it should be worth, which means the longer a game is the more it's worth as people are using length as a measure of a games worth.