billy07 said:
I am not complaining, I am observing. And as to the reply of the mod above, I was indeed offering constructive criticism when I said you need to begin providing targeted ads instead of ads that have nothing to do with video games -which in turn would boost your revenue and make the ads less intrusive for us readers. Two, I don't come on this site for the numbers. I'm one of the few that actually pays for NPD's monthly detailed report. I come here because the forums on this site are considerably more mature and insightfull than most gaming forums out there. The reason I brought the numbers up is because some of the numbers, namely software numbers are still fairly inaccurate. To make the big bucks off a few licensed ads Ioi has to gain the trust of publishers first -And as of right now, with the largest gaming forum on the internet -neogaf- having banned vgchartz numbers outright, there's a lack of trust to encite publishers to consider vgchartz as a valid maketing avenue. Thus in turn for Vgchartz to attract such advertisers ioi has to further work on his numbers. It was intended as a reply to the person that brought up publisher advertising as an alternative to low paying adsense ads. |
When I mentioned Complaining, I was not referring to the ads, I was reffering to the numbers. Even if you don't think the numbers are accurate I believe that there is no need to restate your opinions many times. We get it, you don't believe the numbers are accurate, but for a free service,VGC does pretty damn good. I think you can agree with that.
As for NeoGaf banning all VGC members, that's just stupid and childish. It's like if Youtube banned all Asians, and if VGC banned all Christians. If people believe that VGC #'s are accurate then they shouldn't be criticized for it.
Sorry if I come off as a Ass. 
