why is nintendo wrong to be proud of their metacritic scores?

[HollyGamer]

Wyrdness said:

HollyGamer said:

" which both critics and consumers consider them to be good overall ", to bad it's only  small consumer appreciate their hard work, it's sad

"sales do not dictate quality and vice versa", yup and that's why bragging quality to help covering their sales number is not a good way either.

"You clearly know little about investors and you don't want to get into that argument with me because I deal with them on a day to day basis in my job", How do you know me Lol, do i refuse to argue, because is not worth to argue. if you want to argue by all means please do, and if you brag about how you are expert in this please feel free, i am an investor not people who deal with Investor, so i know about what to be investor is.

"As an investor the quality of the product is key factor in your judgement in investing, look up on value investing that Warren Buffet is famous for, even if Nintendo doesn't sell as much as Sony or MS they'll always have a dedicated fanbase who generate more then enough money for them to stay in the markets and in turn make investors money" , Then are the meta critique give a result on attract more sales and helping their market grow??????? You know this right, it's like you open a gate of many question about how Iwata practice on relying on Meta critique help them with selling their games.

This reply fails to even address any point made and simply side steps which highlights a lack of either understanding on the topic you were attempting to argue or a case of you just trying to argue it for the sake of being negative or maybe even both. Pepsi don't have anywhere near as much market share as Coke with the latter having almost 70% of their market but the former have more then enough to go on and that's because the quality of the products are good which is why they consistently maintain a market share that sustains them and their share holders, highlighting that their products maintain quality is good for investors in the long run espcially as each generation for consoles is a reset.

I don't have to know you I just have to read what you post, when I do trades for investors in shares and so on which is relevant in this case I give them 5 clear reasons why they should buy into the company and enter the position. Yeah the are a lot of stupid investors out there but if you look at the top dogs and serious punters they look at multiple aspects on why they keep hold of positions in the long run, sales is flawed in what you're arguing because Nintendo has turned a profit and made more money off lower hardware sales consistently for years then their competitors so what you're arguing about sales and money is also calling your ownself out.

You cannot compare Pepsi with Nintendo, despite they have a good result on their sales report, every video game market is affected by smart device like , mobile phone and gaming tab, Staying quite is not a wise decision to stay on the same position, while Nintendo may satisfied with their current market and income statement, bigger threat is comming and one of them is from their own loyal fans, you know their games is only cater for the veteran and small avid gamer who like their type of games, and within  a time, many will grew up, getting old and not playing their game anymore, while Nintendo keeping the same formula again and again.

and off course there is no denying Nintendo making a lot of profit, but is it enough to warant Nintendo from staying in the Industry?