Conegamer on 19 February 2015
| walsufnir said: A guy who before claimed on GAF that he had completed the game and it took him over 10 hours posted this: "Reading several of the worst reviews they reflect what I expected. Some reviewers still holding on to bad PR statements and using them to fuel their desire for something to be worse than it actually is. The game is far from revolutionary but it is also not a bad game this is pretty pathetic, journalism at its worst. Looking at the scores of more recent games and then looking at the score the Order received just confirms these scores were set in stone quite a while ago." This is exactly the attitude that is making its way over to this forum, sadly. |
You make a good point; PR and other events can influence a game and its review, but that's also something that works both ways. I think a 70 on Metacritic would a reasonably accurate representation of the game, looking at reviews and some of the gameplay on YT.
