tokilamockingbrd said:
Zackasaurus-rex said:
I'll screencap, but this test is kind of dumb. lol I mean, it's in line with my actual scores... But it's a lot less thorough than the real IQ tests I was made to take while growing up. The time dependency is also kind of shady... The methodology isn't even mentioned before taking the test. I had a feeling that time would matter, so I rushed through it as quickly as I could.
Full disclosure: I do very well on IQ tests, and I also think that they're semi-bullshit.
|
in line with your actual IQ? You do realize that a 200 is 1 in 76 billion. right which would pretty much make you the smartest person that has ever lived. Even if you drop it down to 180 that would make you one of the 300 smartest people in the world (1 in 20 million)
Even freaken Albert Einstein had a 160..... darwin 165.... Galilei was like 185 (so fucking smart)
Just saying anyone over 150 and you are considered a genious (which you may be not saying your not, stupid people dont get hooked a sales forums, well mostly not...)
|
I would just like to point out that the IQs for historical figures are based on nonsensical extrapolations and hold very little credence. IQ tests have no relevance or applicability for people with that level of intellect.
Although it could be argued that the same is true in the general populous as well.
