By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Shinobi-san said:
dane007 said:
Zekkyou said:
true_fan said:
7.5 sounds too high based on the cons listed. The amount of time you spend watching the game is nearly as much time as you are playing the game, shameful.

It's shameful for a game with a strong focus on being cinematic to have a lot of cinematic? Huh.


but if you are paying 60 bucks for a game or 100 bucks in nz, you would hope to get a bit more gameplay then 4 hours right?  Being cinematic si cool, but you don't make nearly half the game cinematic. I wouldn't mind if its was 3 hour cinematic and 7 hour gameplay.

I think its very much depends on the total package or experience they have managed to deliver. I dont think its as simple as just counting hours. If the gameplay and cutscenes are seamless and done right then its fine. Afterall they scored the game a 7.5.

That being said 7 hours total playthough time is not ideal regardless. Our tolerance for short games has increased since last gen, which i think is a bad thing.


fair enough. I haven't played it yet so i can't judge it yet.. However it is disappointing to know that its only 7 hours and half of it is cutscenes and QTEs. With that said,  i will still get game as it should be entertianing enough ,plus tis eye candy with those graphics lol. Yep i agree. Games should not be  short and then be justified because its cinematic. YOu can have a cinematic gamem and still have decent length and replayability .