By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vivster said:
dane007 said:
Zekkyou said:
true_fan said:
7.5 sounds too high based on the cons listed. The amount of time you spend watching the game is nearly as much time as you are playing the game, shameful.

It's shameful for a game with a strong focus on being cinematic to have a lot of cinematic? Huh.


but if you are paying 60 bucks for a game or 100 bucks in nz, you would hope to get a bit more gameplay then 4 hours right?  Being cinematic si cool, but you don't make nearly half the game cinematic. I wouldn't mind if its was 3 hour cinematic and 7 hour gameplay.

If you're paying 60 bucks for a game and are concerned that you're getting enough bang for your buck you may want to do some research beforehand.


lol true but a game shouldn't be that short and have half of the game with cutscenes and qte and then say quality is more important then the length of game. I will get it still as it will an etertaining enough eye candy to play