| Dr.Henry_Killinger said: So then you admit that you refuse to understand on the grounds that you don't. I love that line "stopped reading". You claim to wish to engage in debate and yet you "stop reading" anything that might contradict you. Even if it is just a matter of faulty logic. Lucky for you that you keep your "arguments" out of actual debate and discussion, they'd get shot down in an instant. It would be funny if it weren't so unfortunate, here I am explaining to you your mistakes and you refuse to comprehend them on the basis that you do not understand them. The greatest irony is that you say "It will be a post full of seeing it from one way, ignoring important fact, misunderstanding and twisting to suit you." when this is EXACTLY what you are doing. You can only see my posts, from your way. You are ignoring the important facts about statistics, actual logic, actual reason. You are misunderstanding and twisting, so that instead actually going back revaluating and thinking, you can just repeat the same nonsense but louder. The worst part is when your comprehension is put into such question, I'm not even sure you even fathom your errors. What a shame. |
I think I explained why I haven't or will not read your post. Pretty much the first thing you said was
"If you say:
1+1= 3 and so 3 blah blah blah.
I'm saying:
1 + 1 does not equal 3"
You're saying that your one track mind is right and I'm wrong and there is no other outcome. Not going any further into with you. What's the point? You haven't come here open minded since your first post. What a shame!
