badgenome on 13 February 2015
Egann said: That said, putting Absolutism next to Darwinism is something I disagree with. They're opposites and don't share any ideals. I have no idea how to fix that. |
Hmmm... I've always seen them as being about one step removed myself. The emperor ideally should be the strongest and most capable individual, and empires should ideally conquer as much as it reasonably can. Sounds like a totalitarian and collectivist form of Darwinism to me.