By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
crissindahouse on 12 February 2015
Edit Thread
badgenome said:
padib said:

There was nothing in Charlie Hebdo which was of interest to any of us but to stir our anti-islamist emotions, and to top it off it was a fabrication by an occult group to promote Zionism.

This case is much more honest, 3 innocent youths killed and no trace of the murderer. That's news!

This is hands down the battiest thing I've ever read on this forum. 18 people dead, 22 injured, protracted standoffs and hostage situations and manhunts, and it's not of any real interest. (Oh, and by the way, it was all teh conspiracy!)

It's already hard to believe that this is really what he thinks but maybe we should also add to all the logical reason why the Charlie Hebdo thing which took I believe around three full days (what a surprise that it was for some days in the media) that it should be also obvious that journalists report more about an attack on other "journalists" when this is an religious motivated attack which shows journalists around the world that it could also happen to them if they use their freedom of speech to the degree that some crazy guys could kill them for that.

Yes, I can fully understand that journalists around the world feel a little bit personal about this realizing what can happen if they do something in the newspapers or in front of a cam which coud make some crazy boys very angry. 

This was also obviously an terroristic act as much as I understand this term correctly after reading little bit about it, also no idea why some in this thread complain that this was called an terroristc attack and the other not.