By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vivster said:
sc94597 said:

I take it you hadn't built a PC when the PS360 released? An 8800 GT (high-end card) cost about $350 (GTX about $450) and the card couldn't run Crysis (a 2007 game) at much more than medium-high, 900p, 30fps. The cards today run their respective games fine, in retrospect.  

 

Crysis is a horrible example for anything. But if you want to play that game.

Crysis 3, a 2 year old game, does a maximum of 40 fps on ultra 1080p with a GTX980, aka the strongest single GPU on the market right now. That one will set you back over $500 without even reaching 60fps.

How is that cheaper?

Or we're reasonable people and take some of the better optimized games and not some code that Crytek shat into a text editor.

Far Cry 4 and DAI were some of the better running games and still; a 970 is minimum requirement if you want to run it at a stable 60fps on ultra in Far Cry 4. DAI is a bit worse with a 980 barely reaching 60fps on average.

This is just the start of the gen and there will be a lot of unoptimized shit that can't be run by any high end card. Nope it's definitely not cheaper. Then again, if you want cheap, why use a PC?

It's definitely cheaper this gen. I built my current PC in 2013 and still manage to outperform the consoles; higher res, better performance and more effects.

Last gen I built a PC for similar money at the start of the gen and only just managed to match the performance of the 360/PS3. That was with a "decent" GPU released a year into the gen.