By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kumagawa on 10 February 2015
Edit Thread
The Fury said:
V-r0cK said:

lol i dont think im up to date on all the comics but did see some comics that had sunspot and cannonball. They definitely seem off for Avengers.  And I agree that Spiderman will be oddly placed in with the avengers.

If we cant have avengers vs xmen then at least just get xmen back.  It's feels odd that Avengers cant use the word 'mutants' and how can you have a movie with Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch without Magneto.  I'm really curious to see how this will all play out.

Sony bought ownership of Spiderman in 1999 i believe for just $7million.  I wonder how much Disney would pay to buy from Sony? 

If you start reading (again?), skip Avengers until after whatever they are doing is done. I'm only reading 3 Marvel books, the main 2 X-men books plus Avengers and Avenger is incoherent. It's covering a story over several months in comics, several books in comics and too many characters. Hickman also introduced New Universe characters into the 616. Basically god like characters. I think he thinks he's writing the Justice League, no "Earth's Mighiest Heroes".

This is my biggest issue with the affair, the term 'mutant'. Whoever signed that contract that made is so Fox had the term mutant was a right idiot, hope they got sacked. And yes, Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver without their history are just not them. 

It's weird, you'd think Disney could come up with a way to null these contracts, break them even and just pay a fine. Anything.

The contract was sighned when Marvel was facing bankruptcy for the second time in a decade and the money they got was enough to start Making there own films.  Just think if those contracts never happened Marvel would have gone bust the comics would have ended and the popular characters would have been bought in full by big studios why the lesser known may have ended up owned by hundreds of companies.