small44 said:
PSP had a good sale because it have good support better support then Vita+3ds combined from 3rd party. Sony tried to target everybody with vita and they fail they failed to attract casuals but Playstation consoles home console and handheld never succeed to attracted casuals unlike Nintendo they tried to attact smartphone gamers but they can't because it's not the right audience to attract they tied to attract hardocre gamers but their first party was never the reason of Playstation success and they fail to make 3rd party support vita well. I hope this is the last Sony handheld so those stupid 3rd party stop getting money for their lazy port |
PSP had a good launch sales because they have a decent first party line up, advertising, and PR tools, then market react positively (no competitor from smart phone), after that third party (the big one like square and capcom) begin to supporting it. Unlike Vita which had the same initial press release but the market react negatively (the consumer already into smartphones ) and third party is not willing to support it and SONY seem to give up with the market.
By the way it's not a system (PS, Xbox, Wii U, Vita, PSP, 3DS) that sell games, it games that sell system. What i mean is before the system get a decent support form 3rd party the system need to sell first. That's why blaming 3rd party is wrong because third party always look on earlier sells and their potential market for the system. Just look how PS4 can sell with limited games on their launching day.
Agree with u about Playstation success is not because solely on first party, it's because they have a balance between , potential market, first party games and third party games. But i disagree if you saying 3rd party is failed to support Vita, it's the opposite " VITA FAILED TO SUPPORT THIRD PARTY GAME'S ".
Edited








