By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zero129 said:
Player2 said:

No. I'm using Buzz and SingStar to show that he's and hypocrite.

Sport franchises don't need to be yearly, specially in this day and age. A DLC roster update (which is what most of them are and why they're easy to develop) priced at $10-20 should be enough.

Exactly how would them 2 games be proving his a hypocrite??. Clearly you understand what his saying but for some reason you just want to try finding some fault. His not talking about simple Singing/Sports/And gameshow type games that can have a new one made and player tested well within a year. His talking about more Complex type games that need a lot of testing and more time to make and instead of being giving that time they are being rushed to market.

And remember DLC on consoles only really started taking off in 2005-6, so yes that could be done now but back then that wasnt an option.


We have seen a few games recently that seemed to be rushed as they launched in a horrible state but these aren't released "annually", except AC:Unity. Which other games would be on that annual, rushed list?