Arkaign said:
Chris Hu said:
Nope, Green Bay, Dallas or Detroit would have gotten demolished by the Patriots since their defenses are nowhere near top notch and closer to what the Colts have and they totally got destoyed by the Patriots. Plus neither of those teams have a good rushing defense Brady could have easily won against any of those teams without even passing for 250 yards. Also why did you even bring up Detroit they got manhandled by the Patriots during week 12 even though they where as close to full strenght as the where all season during that game. Green Bay would be the only team that could have come close and they still would have lost by at least 7 points. The only reason they won the regular season matchup was because of home field advantage and they barely won despite having 158 more offensive yards. Also the only other AFC playoff team that could have beaten the Seahawks on Sunday would have been the Ravens all the other teams would have easily lost against the Seahawks especially the Colts and the Broncos.
|
You mean the same Green Bay team that beat the Patriots 26-21 in November (long after the Patriots got out of their early funk?). 'Totally destroyed', sure. That's why they lost to them previously.
You didn't even read the thing obviously, as the whole point was not 'who is the better team' when playing well, but rather who could have beat those teams considering how horribly they played in the SB. It was a close game, but it was played horribly. If the Patriots and Seahawks played better it wouldn't be as much of a question, but similar to how Seattle played like hammered shit for 3 quarters in the NFC Championship game, both teams played just plain bad in the SB. I've rewatched it twice now, and the 2nd half stands out as just amatuerish overall.
|
At Lambeau Field where Green Bay was perfect this season and when the Pats played them they were averaging almost 44 points per game at home.
