padib said:
Zekkyou said:
This is not an A vs B thread where opinions hold direct weight, it's A vs no A (and where A is a standard for the genre). The only way to argue against the latter is to believe that those who value A are inherently wrong, especially when A's inclusion would have no effect on those who don't care about it. No one benefits from their exclusion, but many do from its inclusion. I personally couldn't care less about stuff like team speak, but i'd never claim my opinion was a basis to argue its irrelevance because it doesn't matter to me regardless. My opinion is worth little in the debate.
On a side note, i was referring to SF4, not LoL (I've never played LoL, though it's FTP so i wouldn't personally hold it to the same standards). A lack of modes is a gameplay diversity issue. SF4 has the same issue with modes, but dozens of completely unique ways of enjoying that mode, without even including personal play styles. Splatoon, like all online shooters, doesn't have that luxury. While there can be variations within games, they are still revolve around a singular point, which many will get bored of quickly.
You're perfectly in the right to have an opinion/preference, but trying to use it as a basis for why others are wrong is really quite silly.
|
If I disagree with someone, I am entitled to argue that I am right, and in that case they would be wrong or there is a misunderstanding.
I don't think it's silly.
By the way, Splatoon will have tons of variety even between players. Check the latest Nintendo direct.
http://youtu.be/t6zgkp1YBRw?t=15m20s
|
If you beleive that your opinion is a valid basis to claim people shouldn't be botherd by the total exclution of features and content, then fine, felel free ^^ Won't stop me finding it silly.
As for the latter point, "While there can be variations within games, they are still revolving around a singular point, which many will get bored of quickly." I personally couldn't care less, but i find it pretty easy to understand why some people would be disappointed by being locked to singular focus.
