MTZehvor said:
And this is precisely why I didn't bother to answer you seriously at first. I gave a clear explanation as to how not only does Spygate have no proveable link to any of the first 3 Super Bowls, and there's been nothing but conflicting (at best) evidence involving Deflategate, and all of that gets ignored and instead it's just "wah cheated wah" Too much haterade being drunk. |
I disagree with your "explanation." There's been plenty of evidence that they were doing far more than you're letting on during the spygate years. I would be a hater if I accused the Steelers or Giants of cheating to win their 2 recent superbowls because there's been no evidence of them doing any such thing. It took them years after their cameras were taken before they were able to finally win another and it comes only after they've been caught in other breaking of rules? Too much evidence that they can't win legitimately to give them full credit.
