By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mornelithe on 01 February 2015
Edit Thread
RolStoppable said:
mornelithe said:
So, with the additional information from Ian Rappaport, would it now be appropriate to start questioning the Colts involvement in this? If the only ball 2PSI under, was the ball that was in their hands, and the rest were only 'a few ticks under'...shouldn't that be raising questions about who had contact with the football after the interception?

No. No, it should not.

Well, unfortunately for you the leagues 'preponderance of the evidence' suggests otherwise.  There's a very low level of evidence needed in integrity of the game issues.  So, if Rappaports report is true, it's frankly a lesser stretch of the imagination to suggest the Colts tampered with the ball, post interception, than it is an 'elderly man' deflated 11 footballs in 98 seconds.