By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nem said:
DonFerrari said:

It isn't a ignored fact... the same way X1 allows you to use an external HD but that don't make it a bother that MS don't allow easy change of internal drive.

Anyway, most users don't want to get all the hasle just to circunvent designs limitations.


Be that as it may, i still dont see my comment on the Wii U tie-in to not be correct based on the numbers we have. At worst, its doing close to what the ps4 and x1 are doing, wich is pretty decent. There really is no way to spin this in a negative tone. Those are good software sales numbers for the intalled base.


It is better than X1 and PS4 at the moment because it had a year head start and bundled games since ever.. but yes there is no spin to negative side... the good games Nintendo put had quite the high attach rate like 30-50% of userbase. But even so that is a little off-topic.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."