spemanig said:
vivster said:
You do know that there is a difference between a detailed giant track with 8 individual racers and a lot going on simultaneously and a tiny low res arena with only 2 participants with predictable patterns. Of course it looks better, because it is simply a lot less demanding than MK8 and as such they can incorporate more high quality assets.
We know that Wii U is capable of delivering 720p at 60fps. This game shouldn't be different considering the drastically reduced scope.
Your subjective perception has no effect on how demanding a game is. Also you may want to look back at some HD screens of MK8.
|
I've seen traditional 2D fighters running, at 60fps, on the Wii U. There's nothing that even slightly comes close to this. Look at Tekken TT2, a game made by the same exact company. It doesn't even come close to looking this detailed. It's not subjective perception. It's literally right there. Even I know that it isn't as simple as "well if it's 720p 60fps one one thing, it's got to be possible on everything!" Wii U is capable of MK8 at 720p 60fps. Definitely not what's shown here. I will gladly eat crow stew if that turns out not the case.
|
You're seriously comparing a multiplatform game (PS3, XBOX 360, Wii U) from 2012 to an exclusive high profile franchise game that will probably only release in 2016 (if at all)?
