By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

I'm going to use simple deductive reasoning to show how either both systems have split-screen or neither of them do:

The only version that's ever been shown to the press is the 360 one. Naturally, one would assume that this is because it is either running equally to or better than the PS3 version (because they wouldn't show off the inferior version).

Using this logic, if the 360 version ran better than or equal to the PS3 version, either both would be capable of splitscreen or neither of them would be.


Now, the other point some have made is that Sony may have paid to keep this feature exclusive, like MS did with the DLC. However, Sony haven't said anything about this feature. A company buys things like that to increase sales, and what would the use be of doling out cash for extra features that your competition doesn't have if nobody knows about it?



Using this deductive reasoning, it would be logical to assume that either both have splitscreen or neither do.



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."